Marian
K. Williams: An Opponent of Hazing for Professional &
Personal Reasons
Marian
K. Williams, newly named chair of the National Panhellenic
Conference (an umbrella organization of female fraternities),
has agreed to respond to interview questions regarding Greek
life in the year 2000.
A graduate
of the University of Missouri with a B.S, in Education., Williams
has taught physical education at Christian College in Columbia,
Missouri; University City Public Schools in University City,
Missouri; and most recently in Albuquerque [NM] Public Schools.
Married
to Chuck Williams, recently retired after 38 years with theUniversity
of New Mexico, Physics Department, she has five grandchildren
and three children: Steve, a West Point graduate and a Lt.
Colonel at the Pentagon; Debbie (a member of the UNM chapter
of Kappa Kappa Gamma) now with the Department of Energy; and
Ken (Sigma Alpha Epsilon member while at UNM)--now with Smart
Money Magazine in financial planning.
Williams
herself is a member of Kappa Kappa Gamma. She has worked for
the female fraternity since 1969 in such positions as province
officer, director of standards, director of field representatives,
director of membership, and Fraternity President. She is active
in civic affairs, including participation in the Community
- Junior League of Albuquerque, Albuquerque Goals Committee,
Albuquerque Environmental Concerns Commission, Emergency Medical
Services
Board,
Board of Directors of Chaparral Girl Scout Council, and UNM
Greek Review Board.
Here are
her views on hazing and Greek life in 2000:
NUWER:
Could you enlighten us what your family learned (about hazing
and/or alcohol use) that can help others?
WILLIAMS:
Hazing was something that happened to someone else. As a fraternity
leader, we [my family and I] talked around our table about
those experiences we heard or read about. I educated my son
about his ability to say "no" when he went into
hell week (for Sigma Alpha Epsilon at the University of New
Mexico). The "Hazing builds unity" mentality and
"one has to earn his/her membership" are [attitudes
that are] so prevalent on campus. The use of alcohol simply
magnifies this thinking.
Reality
sets in when the phone rings and an undergraduate calls to
tell you that your son is hospitalized [because of alcohol]
and then reads [you] an attorney-prepared statement attempting
to absolve the brothers and the fraternity of any responsibility.
It is difficult enough to deal with the chapter members and
yet another [difficulty] to get the...national organization
to act in a responsible manner.
Families
and potential members must be aware that the potential for
hazing exists. They should know what the fraternity commitment
is to educate, hold members accountable, and what alumni/alumnae
presence can be expected during [fraternal] activities. We
[the NPC] further recommend alcohol-free housing, along with
extensive education on health (and) safety—with emphasis on
sisterhood/brotherhood.
NUWER:
Will the alcohol-free housing initiatives and alcohol-free
co-sponsored events in men’s fraternity facilities be successful?
WILLIAMS:
The time to change the culture is past due. These initiatives
are giant steps to create the change and need the support
of all the men’s and women’s groups, NPC/NIC, and IFC/CPH.
Communication, education, accountability, and evaluation will
determine their success. In alcohol-free housing, some early
statistics have shown an increase in recruitment, fewer police
reports, and higher grades [among members].
NUWER:
How has the sorority culture changed from your undergraduate
days to today?
WILLIAMS:
Trends in society and campus culture both have a dramatic
effect on sorority life. Life on campus and in society in
the 1950s and 1990s are light years apart. I went to the University
of Missouri in the late 1950s and life on campus was far more
conservative. In loco parentis was in effect and authority
or rules were rarely questioned. Responsibility and accountability
were expectations [of us]. We came from strong family backgrounds
where standards and values were taught. Our support systems
were in place. We graduated in four years and few had to work
to finance their education. The campus and community environments
were safe. Liability was not an issue nor was the presence
or dominance of alcohol. We had an abundance of role models
as our advisors because women [then] had the time to volunteer
their services.
NUWER:
What remains constant?
WILLIAMS:
The constant is that the purposes of the organizations have
not changed. In meeting the needs of today’s members, emphasis
in programming areas [women’s issues, alcohol awareness, healthy
eating habits, etc.] has had to change. The sphere of influence
of the national organization has grown due to the diminished
time of today’s volunteer on the local level.
NUWER:
What are your goals in your new position as NPC chair?
WILLIAMS:
NPC is a conference composed of 26 member groups. These value
their sovereignty and yet make decisions for the good of the
whole. To that end I want to provide opportunities for educational
seminars so that we all have the same information on which
to make those decisions. [I want] to give academics top priority
[so] that all of our College Panhellenics will be above the
All-Women’s [Gradepoint] Average on campus. [I want] to collectively
pool our resources to provide joint programming for all of
our member chapters. [I want] to design an effective public
relations plan which tells the value of women’s fraternities
most effectively.
NUWER:
Short-term goals?
WILLIAMS:
I would like to encourage all 26 member groups and College
Panhellenics to take a unified approach to alcohol-free co-sponsored
events [beginning in Fall 2000] in men’s fraternity facilities
[and/or houses]. [I would like to] encourage College Panhellenics
to provide an atmosphere of support where all chapters can
succeed on the campus [and] to empower women to set an example
for the Greek community.
NUWER:
Long-term goals?
WILLIAMS:
To work collaboratively with all of the Greek-letter organizations
in providing a quality experience for our members and to live
by example [so] we are what we say we are.
At present,
we work collaboratively with the Association of Fraternity
Advisors, the National Interfraternity Conference, the National
Panhellenic Council, the NASPA Fraternity/Sorority Network,
the NASPA Summit and other organizations which affect our
members. With the advent of many of the Greek organizations
forming along cultural lines, we need to include them. We
belong to a number of organizations—such as the Inter-Association
Task Force which talks about alcohol issues. The list is endless
and vital to our well being. Not only are alliances important
nationally, but our College Panhellenics should be doing this
on campus as well.
NUWER:
Your own Kappa Kappa Gamma has long fought hazing and yet
one chapter that hazes can get more press attention than all
the chapters that perform exemplary service. Could you give
your views on media handling of sorority incidents—including
the recent article on sorority life ("Sorority Girl Secrets"
by Evan Wright) published in Rolling Stone Magazine (10/14/99).
WILLIAMS:
There is a big difference in reporting an incident with honesty
and fairness to both sides and one which "sensationalizes"
the event. Rarely does one read of the action taken internally
by the undergraduate chapter members against the perpetrators—or
the action taken by the national organization and all of the
followup to ensure the safety and well being of members. The
Rolling Stone articles is not a reflection of the quality
of sorority life that I know of on the Ohio State University
campus. It is trash journalism that sells that kind of magazine
and not worthy of my comment.
NUWER:
Is there a need for sororities on today’s campuses?
WILLIAMS:
Absolutely, now perhaps more than ever before. Women will
always seek the friendship with those who share common interests
and goals. Our values-based organizations give them that opportunity
of life-long friendship, opportunities for self-growth, mutual
support, service to others, the campus, the community. [They
provide] respect for intellectual development and an allegiance
to positive ethical principles. The programming and other
opportunities for the development of life skills are not available
in any other student organization.
NUWER:
What is it you personally stand for as a member of a
Greek community?
WILLIAMS:
I am a person of principle who role models the standards we
in the Greek community profess. I am who I am because of my
sorority experience. It is the beacon in my life.
|